Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies.

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Mapping and Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes: State of the Art.

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common arrhythmias in clinical practice. Although benign and asymptomatic in most cases, PVCs may result in disabling symptoms, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or PVC-induced ventricular fibrillation. Catheter ablation has emerged as a first-line therapy in such cases, with high rates of efficacy and low risk of complications. Significant progress in mapping and ablation technology has been made in the past 2 decades, along with the development of a growing body of knowledge and accumulated experience regarding PVC sites of origin, anatomical relationships, electrocardiographic characterization, and mapping/ablation strategies. This paper provides an overview of the main indications for catheter ablation of PVCs, electrocardiographic features, PVC mapping techniques, and contemporary ablation approaches. The authors also review the most common sites of PVC origin and the main considerations and challenges with ablation in each location.

Cardioneuroablation for the management of patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias: the CNA-FWRD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Cardioneuroablation has been emerging as a potential treatment alternative in appropriately selected patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS) and functional AV block (AVB). However the majority of available evidence has been derived from retrospective cohort studies performed by experienced operators. METHODS: The Cardioneuroablation for the Management of Patients with Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope and Symptomatic Bradyarrhythmias (CNA-FWRD) Registry is a multicenter prospective registry with cross-over design evaluating acute and long-term outcomes of VVS and AVB patients treated by conservative therapy and CNA. RESULTS: The study is a prospective observational registry with cross-over design for analysis of outcomes between a control group (i.e., behavioral and medical therapy only) and intervention group (Cardioneuroablation). Primary and secondary outcomes will only be assessed after enrollment in the registry. The follow-up period will be 3 years after enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a lack of prospective multicentered data for long-term outcomes comparing conservative therapy to radiofrequency CNA procedures particularly for key outcomes including recurrence of syncope, AV block, durable impact of disruption of the autonomic nervous system, and long-term complications after CNA. The CNA-FWRD registry has the potential to help fill this information gap.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score.

BACKGROUND: Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups. METHODS: Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%). RESULTS: In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807). CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerve (PECs) blocks are established regional anesthesia techniques that can provide analgesia to the anterior chest wall. Although commonly performed preoperatively by anesthesiologists, the feasibility of electrophysiologist-performed PECs blocks from within cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pockets at the time of implantation has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of routine PECs blocks performed by the electrophysiologist from within the exposed device pocket at the time of CIED procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing CIED procedures underwent a PECs I block (15 cc of 1% lidocaine/0.25% bupivacaine) injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles guided by ultrasound placed in the device pocket, or PECs II block, which included a second injection (15 cc) between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. Postoperatively, pain was assessed on a numeric scale (0-10) at 1, 2, 4, and 24 h, and 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Among 20 patients (age 65 ± 16 years, 70% male, 55% with history of chronic pain), PECs I (75%) and PECs II (25%) blocks were performed. The procedures were de novo implantation (n = 17) or device revision (n = 3). The average pain score in the first 4 h was 0.4 ± 0.8 and 0.3 ± 0.6 at 24 h after the procedure. During the 24-h postoperative period, 4 patients received opioids. Two patients were discharged with opioids for pain unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PECs blocks can be feasibly performed from within an exposed pocket at the time of CIED procedures with minimal postoperative pain.

Cardioneuroablation for the treatment of ictal-associated cardiac asystole: case report and literature review.

Background: Ictal-associated bradyarrhythmia or asystole can be a manifestation of malignant seizure syndromes. In patients with ictal-associated hypervagotonia and asystole, cardioneuroablation may provide a promising alternative to permanent pacemaker implantation. Case summary: We present a case of a 47-year-old female with a 1.5-year history of ongoing uncontrolled seizures with multiple semiologies despite multiple antiepileptic drugs who had episodes of symptomatic severe sinus bradycardia (15-30 b.p.m.) and sinus pauses (15-16 s). She underwent a successful cardioneuroablation for ictal-induced asystole with complete resolution of bradyarrhythmias. Discussion: This case highlights the utility of cardioneuroablation in patient with ictal-induced cardiac bradyarrhythmia and asystole. Cardioneuroablation may be an approach to avoid permanent pacemakers in this population.

Identifying Origin of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Using 2 Stationary Linear Decapolar Catheters: A Novel Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Targeting nonpulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation can be challenging. NPVTs are often single ectopic beats with a surface P-wave obscured by a QRS or T-wave. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to construct an algorithm to regionalize the site of origin of NPVTs using only intracardiac bipolar electrograms from 2 linear decapolar catheters positioned in the posterolateral right atrium (along the crista terminalis with the distal bipole pair in the superior vena cava) and in the proximal coronary sinus (CS). METHODS: After pulmonary vein isolation in 42 patients with AF, pacing from 15 typical anatomic NPVT sites was conducted. For each pacing site, the electrogram activation sequence was analyzed from the CS catheter (simultaneous/chevron/inverse chevron/distal-proximal/proximal-distal) and activation time (ie, CSCTAT) between the earliest electrograms from the 2 decapolar catheters was measured referencing the earliest CS electrogram; a negative CSCTAT value indicates the crista terminalis catheter electrogram was earlier, and a positive CSCTAT value indicates the CS catheter electrogram was earlier. A regionalization algorithm with high predictive value was defined and tested in a validation cohort with AF NPVTs localized with electroanatomic mapping. RESULTS: In the study patient cohort (71% male; 43% with persistent AF, 52% with left atrial dilation), the algorithm grouped with high precision (positive predictive value 81%-99%, specificity 94%-100%, and sensitivity 30%-94%) the 15 distinct pacing sites into 9 clinically useful regions. Algorithm testing in a 98 patient validation cohort showed predictive accuracy of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm defined by the activation sequence and timing of electrograms from 2 linear multipolar catheters provided accurate regionalization of AF NPVTs to guide focused detailed mapping.

Accuracy of symptoms and pulse checking for detecting atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the possibility of discontinuing oral anticoagulation following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether patients can accurately detect arrhythmia recurrences following ablation. We therefore sought to characterize the accuracy of pulse checking and arrhythmia symptoms for the identification of AF following ablation. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) treated with catheter ablation for AF who recorded the results from minimum twice daily pulse checks and additionally with arrhythmia symptoms into a diary for 2 months following their procedure. Accuracy of this self-assessment protocol was determined by comparison to ICM-detected AF. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (age 69 ± 8 years, 30 (55%) male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1. 5) were included. Patients recorded a total of 5911 pulse checks, and there were 280 episodes of ICM-documented AF among 26 patients with an average duration of 2.5 ± 3.3 h. Among 362 episodes of patient-suspected AF, 134 correlated with ICM-identified AF (37% true positive rate). Of the 5549 pulse checks that did not identify AF, 196 correlated with ICM-identified AF (4% false negative rate). Twice daily pulse checking had a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 96% for identifying each episode of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a strategy of pulse checks and symptom assessment is insufficient to identify all episodes of AF in many patients following catheter ablation.

Substrate and arrhythmia characterization using the multi-electrode Optrell mapping catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation-a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of a multi-electrode Optrell mapping catheter during ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures has not been widely reported. OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe the feasibility and safety of using the Optrell multipolar mapping catheter (MPMC) to guide catheter ablation of VT and PVCs. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent VT or PVC ablation between June and November 2022 utilizing the MPMC. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria (13 VT and 7 PVC ablations, 80% male, 61 ± 15 years). High-density mapping was performed in the VT procedures with median 2753 points [IQR 1471-17,024] collected in the endocardium and 12,830 points [IQR 2319-30,010] in the epicardium. Operators noted challenges in manipulation of the MPMC in trabeculated endocardial regions or near valve apparatus. Late potentials (LPs) were detected in 11 cases, 7 of which had evidence of isochronal crowding demonstrated during late annotation mapping. Two patients who also underwent entrainment mapping had critical circuitry confirmed in regions of isochronal crowding. In the PVC group, high-density voltage and activation mapping was performed with a median 1058 points [IQR 534-3582] collected in the endocardium. CONCLUSIONS: This novel MPMC can be used safely and effectively to create high-density maps in LV endocardium or epicardium. Limitations of the catheter include a longer wait time for matrix formation prior to starting point collection and challenges in manipulation in certain regions.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Neuromodulation is increasingly recognized as a therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB), transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TcMS), and surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) have all been utilized in this setting. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize contemporary use and outcomes of these neuromodulation techniques for patients with refractory VA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VA from 2019 to 2021 who were treated with SGB, TcMS, or CSD. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 15 polymorphic VAs [44%], refractory to 1.8 ± 0.8 AADs) met inclusion criteria. SGB was performed on 11 patients (32%), TcMS on 19 (56%), and CSD on 7 (21%). Neuromodulation was associated with a reduction in the number of episodes of sustained VAs from 7 [IQR: 4-12] episodes in the 24 hours before the initial neuromodulation strategy to 0 [IQR: 0-1] episodes in the subsequent 24 hours (P < 0.001). During 1.2 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, 21 (62%) experienced recurrent VAs, and among those patients, the median time to recurrence was 3 [IQR: 1-25] days. Outcomes were similar among patients with monomorphic and polymorphic VAs. Among patients who had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before neuromodulation, the burden of VAs decreased from 11 [IQR: 7-12] episodes to 0 episodes in the 24 hours after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic neuromodulation with SGB, TcMS, or CSD in patients with AAD-refractory VAs is safe and results in substantial acute reduction of VA although recurrent arrhythmias are common, and not all patients experience a reduction in arrhythmia burden.